
Author: Ano Sensei
Format: Video
Related content:
- • Have studied or have been studying? Why your textbook may be wrong | ENGLISH IN CONTEXT (Video)
- • Gone to or been to? What most textbooks get wrong | ENGLISH IN CONTEXT (Video)
- • Curated Grammar Livestream: Your Questions Answered (Video Playlist)
- • Basic English Grammar: The Perfect Forms of the Verb (Video Playlist)
- • English in Context: Basic English Grammar (Video Playlist)
📚 Part of a series: English in Context: Basic English Grammar
🧑🎓 Do we always need to backshift in reported speech? ENGLISH IN CONTEXT 👀
Both can be, but textbooks often don't explain this very well. In this video I look ...at backshift in reported speech: what it is, when we use it, and when we don't have to. Many learners have been taught they must always backshift, and some textbooks even mark it as a mistake not to. But whether you backshift or not usually depends on what you're focusing on: the original moment of speaking, or the present relevance of what was said. Often, either is perfectly correct.
What this video covers:
What backshift is and how it works
When backshift is the natural choice
When you can leave the verb in the same tense
Why "both are correct" is often the right answer
What good grammar books say — and what some textbooks get wrong
For a more detailed treatment, see my Spotlight on English video on reported speech and backshift https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0kkmbg2N9M
I'm John R. Yamamoto-Wilson — formerly Professor of English Literature at Sophia University, Tokyo, with a PhD from the University of Cambridge. These videos are aimed at intermediate learners of English, and at the teachers who work with them.
📌 Part of the English in Context series — intermediate grammar points that textbooks often explain poorly or get wrong. Click here for the complete series: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLzVb6yL_jY6_sKngAN_gYB8w-KC20AGP4
© All rights reservedShow More
